Battle of the Bulge (1965) 720p YIFY Movie

Battle of the Bulge (1965)

Battle of the Bulge is a movie starring Henry Fonda, Robert Shaw, and Robert Ryan. A dramatization of Nazi Germany's final Western Front counterattack of World War II.

IMDB: 6.80 Likes

  • Genre: Drama | History
  • Quality: 720p
  • Size: 1.41G
  • Resolution: 1280*800 / 23.976 fpsfps
  • Language: English
  • Run Time: 167
  • IMDB Rating: 6.8/10 
  • MPR: Normal
  • Peers/Seeds: 140 / 104

The Synopsis for Battle of the Bulge (1965) 720p

In the winter of 1944, the Allied Armies stand ready to invade Germany at the coming of a New Year. To prevent this occurrence, Hitler orders an all out offensive to re-take French territory and capture the major port city of Antwerp. "The Battle of the Bulge" shows this conflict from the perspective of an American intelligence officer as well as from a German Panzer Commander.


The Director and Players for Battle of the Bulge (1965) 720p

[Director]Ken Annakin
[Role:]Robert Ryan
[Role:]Henry Fonda
[Role:]Robert Shaw
[Role:]Dana Andrews


The Reviews for Battle of the Bulge (1965) 720p


No excuses, this film is the "Plan 9 from Outer Space" of all war filmsReviewed byeboniusVote: 1/10

As the son of a man who fought and almost died in the Battle of the Ardennes (Battle of the Bulge is a stupid name that brings to mind something to do with weight control), I not only think this is the worst action picture I've ever seen, I'm ashamed that Hollywood insulted our veterans with this stinker two decades after the battle in which so many Americans died to turn the tide in Europe. You know it must be pretty insulting to war veterans if Ike himself bothered to become a movie critic and denounce it as demeaning to our soldiers and their memory.

I try never to say I hate something, but I hate this movie on every possible level. In the war movie genre, it's a zero. In the historical recreation genre, it is a sub-zero. As an action picture, it is unbelievable. Quite simply the only reason anyone should watch this thing is to catalog a list of things you should avoid doing if you ever decide to make a war movie.

By now, you've already read about the gaffs: The anachronisms like a German reading Playboy magazine in the background. The cheap and silly plastic-models-on-a-tabletop war scenes ala Godzilla, The breathtaking inappropriate location of the filming on the Spanish plains instead of using, if not Belgium, then at least some northern European forest country with snow! I mean, my God, would you film a movie about Eskimos in Venezuela? And some reviewers here struggle to make apologies for all this, saying in essence "So what? It was a fun war movie." Who cares if it was filmed in a desert instead of the Ardennes forest? Who cares if they made the Germans into cartoonish Nazis and the Allies into G.I. Joe and Sgt. Rock comic book heroes? Who cares if almost nothing is as it was during the battle?

Well then, why bother to make a movie with the specific title "Battle of the Bulge" at all? Why not just call it, "Clash of the Panzers"? I know, it was the 1960s and it was just meant to entertain and jerk a few bucks out of people's pockets with gimmicks like Cinerama and marquee brand names like Henry Fonda. I know all that.

But it was an insult to the vets who fought and died there. They said it at the time it was made. I can't get beyond that. I have walked the forests and fields around Bastogne where my father endured such an ordeal he would not ever speak of when he was alive. I've walked among the white gravestones of men who died there. I can't bring myself to get to, "So what? It's just a movie." Neither, apparently could the many vets who decided to take their families to this picture when it was released, and then had to sit there, embarrassed and speechless as this movie made a mockery of their struggle.

I fully expect that I'll get a negative rating as to how many people found my comments "useful," but that's OK. From what I've seen, people tend not to like criticism of a film based on subjective, rather than objective remarks. In this case however, I don't care if I get a single "useful" vote. This movie was a travesty in its day, and worse now with the passage of time. It is truly the "Plan 9 From Outer Space" of war movies.

But ending on a positive note: I'd like to see somebody do a spoof film about the making of this movie and how everybody from the screenwriters, to the director and actors and location scouts to the extras in the background didn't give a flying flip about what they were working on except getting a paycheck. That, I'd watch.

Not Worth Bothering With-read a book instead.Reviewed byrudge49Vote: 2/10

This movie is on my list of those that I saw once, was disappointed and do not want to see again. I missed it in the movies in 1965, when I caught it on the tube in 1977 I was annoyed to see that it was merely a generic WWII movie with a big name cast, but no portrayal of actual characters or events, the closet portrayal of anything actually specific to the actual battle was when "GIS" suddenly burst in on the Germans, they are of course English speaking Germans in U.S. uniforms, meant to be a portrayal of Skorzeny's commandos. The scene where the one German officer asks the "U.S. Lieutenant" what he thinks of Hitler, the lieutenant's hesitation between what as a good Wehrmacht soldier he should say and what a real American was too broadly played. The whole movie had a blah quality to it, only truly memorable scene was where the Panzertruppen sing "Panzerlied". The Wehrmacht actually did encourage it soldiers to sing, that much they got right. Otherwise, a waste IMHO. Summary-not worth bothering with.

One of the worst movies ever madeReviewed bybillandersenVote: 1/10

What can I say? Anyone who has seen this movie and knows anything about WWII and the (real) Battle of the Bulge has two choices -- to laugh or to cry. Laugh because this movie has nothing to do with what went on in Belgium in December, 1944. Cry, because it did a tremendous disservice to those on all sides who participated in that battle and to other, infinitely better, depictions of that campaign and period of the war (e.g., "Battleground", "Band of Brothers"). From the "Tigers" (US M-48 tanks painted gray with German crosses) to the lack of anything resembling actual military deportment or tactics, to the filming locations (Fort Hood, Texas just doesn't look like Bastogne -- Pennsylvania would have been a better choice), this movie is every bit as much a stinker as "Battle of the Last Panzer".

"Battle of the Bulge" is typical of other "big concept" novel-based movies like "The Longest Day" (another travesty especially when compared to the likes of "Saving Private Ryan"). I vote this as a contender for one of the worst movies ever made.

Battle of the Bulge (1965) 720p Related Movies

Sprinter (2019) 1080p Poster

Sprinter (2019) 1080p

The Assassin (2015) Poster

The Assassin (2015)

Us (2019) Poster

Us (2019)

The Last Mimzy (2007) 1080p Poster

The Last Mimzy (2007) 1080p

Bohemian Rhapsody (2018) Poster

Bohemian Rhapsody (2018)

Fists in the Pocket (1965) 1080p Poster

Fists in the Pocket (1965) 1080p

Ralph Breaks the Internet (2018) Poster

Ralph Breaks the Internet (2018)

Toy Story 4 (2019) Poster

Toy Story 4 (2019)