Inferno (2016) 1080p YIFY Movie

Inferno (2016) 1080p

When Robert Langdon wakes up in an Italian hospital with amnesia, he teams up with Dr. Sienna Brooks, and together they must race across Europe against the clock to foil a deadly global plot.

IMDB: 6.275 Likes

  • Genre: Action | Adventure
  • Quality: 1080p
  • Size: 1.87G
  • Resolution: 1920*1080 / 23.976 fpsfps
  • Language: English
  • Run Time: 115
  • IMDB Rating: 6.2/10 
  • MPR: Normal
  • Peers/Seeds: 18 / 261

The Synopsis for Inferno (2016) 1080p

Academy Award? winner Ron Howard returns to direct the latest bestseller in Dan Brown's (Da Vinci Code) billion-dollar Robert Langdon series, Inferno, which finds the famous symbologist (again played by Tom Hanks) on a trail of clues tied to the great Dante himself. When Langdon wakes up in an Italian hospital with amnesia, he teams up with Sienna Brooks (Felicity Jones), a doctor he hopes will help him recover his memories. Together, they race across Europe and against the clock to stop a madman from unleashing a global virus that would wipe out half of the world's population.

The Director and Players for Inferno (2016) 1080p

[Director]Ron Howard
[Role:]Tom Hanks
[Role:]Irrfan Khan
[Role:]Felicity Jones

The Reviews for Inferno (2016) 1080p

Reviewed byzeki-4Vote: 6/10/10

Imagine if Spielberg had directed 'Godfather' and Coppola had directedthe Indiana Jones movies. Both great directors, but it wouldn't haveworked.

Same thing applies here. Like the first two in this franchise, 'DaVinci Code' and 'Angels and Demons', there's just something terriblywrong with the direction. Yes, the Langdon movies are suppose to befast paced, but if almost no scenes are allowed to breathe, does itmatter?

And why do director Ron Howard keep on insisting insulting myintelligence? Like in the first two, many things are explained twice,so even the dumbest one in the audience knows what's going on.

Then there's the blatant mistake of shooting the movie in standardwidescreen, instead of cinemascope, like the first two. When you make amovie with several visually looking fantastic locales around the world,it SCREAMS cinemascope.

And the best park of the book? They completely changed it. Guess theywanted to avoid any controversy.

Hans Zimmer's score was great, as usual, though.

The first two Langdon-movies are hovering at 6,6 on IMDb. So will thiswhen the dust settles.

If the studio decides to make 'Lost Symbol' and - for once - have aLangdon movie getting great reviews, they should probably hire anotherdirector.

Reviewed bynalandyVote: 6/10/10

TL;DR: This movie was good but forgettable. Reading the book beforehandis a positive here and you will want to go see it, but keepexpectations down and expect a radically altered story with no lastingimpression. If you haven't read the book, prepare to be confused, butit can still be an entertaining ride.

Edition watched: 2D IMAX

The largest positive for this movie is Tom Hanks. Hank's role here is aslight departure from how he previously played the role, due to thecircumstances that are made apparent from the very beginning (but Iwon't spoil), and yet he was excellent again as Robert Langdon. Asidefrom Hanks, the story was muddled but chase-movie action and constantchanges of beautiful scenery makes this entertaining if forgettable.

I have read the book (and liked it) and I went to see it with 2 peoplewho had not read it.

For those who haven't read the book, you should know that this is notlike the other 2 Dan Brown movies. Those stories dealt with secrets andpuzzles from many years ago (hundreds or thousands in some cases) andthey had that Indiana Jones for the art history major feel to them. Inthis movie, all the puzzles are manufactured by a modern day characterin the story, so it almost completely lacks that Indiana Jones feel.Even though I had warned my movie companions about this, both werequite disappointed by this aspect.

However, the biggest problem my non-book reading movie companions hadwas confusion. As someone who knew what was going on, even I felt theway they injected some story elements and then dropped them just asfast was a bit dizzying. Given that this movie was adapted for thescreen and had radically altered elements from the book, the handlingof the story telling was sub par.

Both of my movie companions felt the movie was entertaining but nothingspecial. One sentence opinion: "It was OK and I enjoyed it." and "Itwas OK, let's go eat."

For those who have read the book, in my opinion this movie departsradically from the source material. That said, reading the book is anadvantage and might be a compelling reason to go see this. Knowing thebook-story means you will know what is going on, even through elementsthat were not in the book and/or were presented poorly (e.g. skinrash). I found the changes made for a better experience since I wasn'tjust seeing a rehash of what I had read. That said, among severaldisappointments, I was looking forward to a Vasari Corridor scene and Iwas very much let down.

One thing to note, Dan Brown's message was pretty much lost and Iwonder if that was intentional? Even the ending, which in the book wasused to punctuate Dan Brown's obvious point, is radically changed inthe movie. So while the basic story is similar, the actual take away Ileft the theater with was very different from the book. I mark this asnegative because the book made me think about what I had taken for agiven, the movie simply entertained me and went away afterwards.

Overall, as someone who read the book, I enjoyed the movie but did feellet down.

Reviewed byGuy JeffriesVote: 5/10/10

So, Ron Howard, Tom Hanks and Hans Zimmer return for the third movieadaptation of Dan Brown's bestselling symbolist and iconologyprofessional, Robert Langdon. Though we seem to be ironically missing,The Lost Symbol where Langdon tramples over Washington's Masonichistory, which is currently in development but with Howard only sittingin a producers chair.

Howard's direction, or the editing seems sloppy and rushed withnoticeable out-of-sync audio. It shows that they struggled withcramming as much as the butchered novel into the 121min runtime,missing possible reshoots as some of the performances are really not upto scratch, namely Sidse Babett Knudsen and Omar Sy.

Hanks, slips into Langdon mode totally as expected and the delightfulFelicity Jones plays the Bond-girl style sidekick very well as we watchthem try to figure out the same puzzles and twists Langdon is usuallypitted against. It's unfortunate that the more I think about it, themore silly the elaborate idea becomes.

There's inconsistencies and obvious inaccuracies with the book and Iwonder how much power Dan Brown had as executive producer. The storyhere appears much weaker than the novel, as does some of itscharacters, especially the reworking of Irrfan Khan's "Provost". A lotof the reasonings are just weak and unrealistic which is a shame forsomething which could actually happen.

Zimmer's score is of the recognisable Langdon theme but, it's beendigitised adding a terrible technical feel that might accompany aespionage thriller. Again, giving me the assumption that the film wasrushed and not the polished film it should have been.

What's possibly the biggest disappointment of the film is the factualreality that the story is based on, and as much as we all might likethe previous, popular Brown conspiracies, this story is a real loomingcrisis. It lacks the serious impact the book gives of the currentpopulation crisis, the fact that we're nearly 9 billion people on aplanet that can currently only support an estimated 4.

It fails to question what we should or what would we do in thissituation, which we are actually in and is a serious topic for worldgovernments, councils and organisations like WHO. Should we actively dosomething about population control or let nature take it's naturalcourse. I don't honestly believe this film has audiences going home andtaking a long hard think about the issue or the implications of virusesand other methods of population control. The real question being, do welet people die or save as many as we can to keep mankind fromextinction.

True to most trilogy tragedies, this is certainly the worse of theseries so far and I'm hoping The Lost Symbol doesn't fall to the samefate with a rumoured Mark Romanek at the helm. I had low expectationsto begin with and unfortunately it didn't hit the mark.

Running Time: 6 The Cast: 6 Performance: 6 Direction: 4 Story: 5Script: 5 Creativity: 7 Soundtrack: 4 Job Description: 3 The ExtraBonus Points: 0 Would I buy the Bluray?: actually yes, only to be partof the series.

46% 5/10

Inferno (2016) 1080p Related Movies

Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017) 1080p Poster

Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017) 1080p

Wicked Blood (2014) Poster

Wicked Blood (2014)

12 Rounds 2: Reloaded (2013) Poster

12 Rounds 2: Reloaded (2013)

Innocent Bystanders (1972) Poster

Innocent Bystanders (1972)

Halo 4: Forward Unto Dawn (2012) Poster

Halo 4: Forward Unto Dawn (2012)

Baywatch (2017) 1080p Poster

Baywatch (2017) 1080p

The Hidden (1987) 1080p Poster

The Hidden (1987) 1080p

Bushwick (2017) Poster

Bushwick (2017)