Inferno (2016) 720p YIFY Movie

Inferno (2016)

When Robert Langdon wakes up in an Italian hospital with amnesia, he teams up with Dr. Sienna Brooks, and together they must race across Europe against the clock to foil a deadly global plot.

IMDB: 6.283 Likes

  • Genre: Action | Adventure
  • Quality: 720p
  • Size: 911.96M
  • Resolution: 1280*800 / 23.976 fpsfps
  • Language: English
  • Run Time: 115
  • IMDB Rating: 6.2/10 
  • MPR: Normal
  • Peers/Seeds: 23 / 182

The Synopsis for Inferno (2016) 720p

Academy Award? winner Ron Howard returns to direct the latest bestseller in Dan Brown's (Da Vinci Code) billion-dollar Robert Langdon series, Inferno, which finds the famous symbologist (again played by Tom Hanks) on a trail of clues tied to the great Dante himself. When Langdon wakes up in an Italian hospital with amnesia, he teams up with Sienna Brooks (Felicity Jones), a doctor he hopes will help him recover his memories. Together, they race across Europe and against the clock to stop a madman from unleashing a global virus that would wipe out half of the world's population.


The Director and Players for Inferno (2016) 720p

[Director]Ron Howard
[Role:]Tom Hanks
[Role:]Irrfan Khan
[Role:]Felicity Jones


The Reviews for Inferno (2016) 720p


The third, and worst, of the Langdon-Hanks-Brown-Howard filmsReviewed byTheLittleSongbirdVote: 3/10

Personally didn't mind 'The Da Vinci Code', though it was a long way from great, but 'Angels and Demons' while with some good things was lacklustre. Unfortunately, the latest film 'Inferno' is no better, in fact all the mistakes made in 'Angels and Demons' are made here and made bigger while a few more grievous ones are made.

There is not much that saves 'Inferno', but it does have to be said that the locations are truly stunning with some nice location work that makes one wish that they belonged in a much better film. Hans Zimmer's music score is haunting once again and accentuates the thriller mood of the film, though it was orchestrated more cleverly before. Tom Hanks again gives his role an easy-going charm and effortless authority, there is not much personal at stake seemingly here for Langdon but Hanks is always watchable and gives his all.

However, that is pretty much all that was good. As has been said already, the worst thing about 'Inferno' is the ending (which, also agreed, was the thing that elevated the book to a greater level, the ending in the book was that good), rendering everything seen in the film and all the events in the book useless in an ending that felt like a tacked on cop-out that reeked of production/studio interference. This said, the ending doesn't single-handedly bring 'Inferno' down, as there are other just as glaring problems too.

Ron Howard's direction is a mess, it is hard to believe that somebody who has a Best Director Oscar and has done some very good to outstanding work directed in a way that suggested more first time director learning (or more like struggling to learn) the ropes, finding urgency is a constant struggle and then he paces things in a rushed and erratic way.

Despite the stunning locations and nice location work, 'Inferno' is cheapened by some haphazard editing and over-reliance on high-speed tracking shots that suggest a cinematographer drunk on the job and have a dizzying effect, actually felt rather woozy and sick after seeing the film. Cast-wise, only Hanks rises above his material. Felicity Jones has a very underwritten character with little backstory and incomplete motivations and it shows in delivery and range lacking in expression, a very going-through-the-motions performance. The rest of the cast either overact or are wasted in caricature roles, with no sense of threat present.

Further disadvantaging them are a very corny script, with countless lines of clunky and awkward dialogue that sounds confused, overly-condensed and disorganised. Even worse a story that just doesn't compel, with its over-explanatory at times, but even more frequently convoluted, nature, and pacing that is so jumpy but at the same time so pedestrian that there is the sense that the writers and Howard had no idea what to do with the material and when and how to bring urgency into it.

On the whole, three or so good things but the rest makes Langdon's hair significantly less floppy in comparison. 3/10 Bethany Cox

Reviewed byGuy JeffriesVote: 5/10/10

So, Ron Howard, Tom Hanks and Hans Zimmer return for the third movieadaptation of Dan Brown's bestselling symbolist and iconologyprofessional, Robert Langdon. Though we seem to be ironically missing,The Lost Symbol where Langdon tramples over Washington's Masonichistory, which is currently in development but with Howard only sittingin a producers chair.

Howard's direction, or the editing seems sloppy and rushed withnoticeable out-of-sync audio. It shows that they struggled withcramming as much as the butchered novel into the 121min runtime,missing possible reshoots as some of the performances are really not upto scratch, namely Sidse Babett Knudsen and Omar Sy.

Hanks, slips into Langdon mode totally as expected and the delightfulFelicity Jones plays the Bond-girl style sidekick very well as we watchthem try to figure out the same puzzles and twists Langdon is usuallypitted against. It's unfortunate that the more I think about it, themore silly the elaborate idea becomes.

There's inconsistencies and obvious inaccuracies with the book and Iwonder how much power Dan Brown had as executive producer. The storyhere appears much weaker than the novel, as does some of itscharacters, especially the reworking of Irrfan Khan's "Provost". A lotof the reasonings are just weak and unrealistic which is a shame forsomething which could actually happen.

Zimmer's score is of the recognisable Langdon theme but, it's beendigitised adding a terrible technical feel that might accompany aespionage thriller. Again, giving me the assumption that the film wasrushed and not the polished film it should have been.

What's possibly the biggest disappointment of the film is the factualreality that the story is based on, and as much as we all might likethe previous, popular Brown conspiracies, this story is a real loomingcrisis. It lacks the serious impact the book gives of the currentpopulation crisis, the fact that we're nearly 9 billion people on aplanet that can currently only support an estimated 4.

It fails to question what we should or what would we do in thissituation, which we are actually in and is a serious topic for worldgovernments, councils and organisations like WHO. Should we actively dosomething about population control or let nature take it's naturalcourse. I don't honestly believe this film has audiences going home andtaking a long hard think about the issue or the implications of virusesand other methods of population control. The real question being, do welet people die or save as many as we can to keep mankind fromextinction.

True to most trilogy tragedies, this is certainly the worse of theseries so far and I'm hoping The Lost Symbol doesn't fall to the samefate with a rumoured Mark Romanek at the helm. I had low expectationsto begin with and unfortunately it didn't hit the mark.

Running Time: 6 The Cast: 6 Performance: 6 Direction: 4 Story: 5Script: 5 Creativity: 7 Soundtrack: 4 Job Description: 3 The ExtraBonus Points: 0 Would I buy the Bluray?: actually yes, only to be partof the series.

46% 5/10

Very disappointedReviewed bylouisemcbride-68495Vote: 5/10

First of all I read the book before watching the film. This seems to be significant on how the reviews are made.

Like a few others have mentioned on here, the ending is such a disappointment. The book has brilliant twists but the movie is classic simple happy ending. Times are changing and I think people are getting tired of cliché happy endings. Imagine leaving the cinema if the movie ended as the book did. The thought provoking debate that would ensue between watchers would be great.

The love story between Langdon and Sinskey isn't needed.

I found Vayentha's acting poor. I couldn't buy into Sienna's role.Poor acting? Maybe.

I thought people should have died at the end of LOTR and that was over 10 years ago. Too many happy endings for my liking. This movie has betrayed the book to its detriment.

Not a happy camper at all.

Inferno (2016) 720p Related Movies

Gringo (2018) 1080p Poster

Gringo (2018) 1080p

Machete (2010) 1080p Poster

Machete (2010) 1080p

Titanic (1943) 1080p Poster

Titanic (1943) 1080p

Timecop (1994) 1080p Poster

Timecop (1994) 1080p

Outpost (2007) Poster

Outpost (2007)

Titanic (1943) Poster

Titanic (1943)

Gringo (2018) Poster

Gringo (2018)

Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle (2017) Poster

Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle (2017)