OK, I admit it, you had me at "Nymphomaniac"...but honestly, the swelling of certain extremities normally associated with the anticipation such a title would evoke, left immediately when I heard LeBeuf speak.The accent he used wasn't even questioned by the director? Did the director actually watch any scenes on playback? Are we to believe that a nymphomaniac believes themselves to be worthless humans? Now, I tried to reserve judgement until I had watched both...a considerable task when one isn't even interested after the "end" of the first trainwreck. I will keep my opinion about the "artistry" to myself. This movie had potential and obviously budget to make a strong impression, but all it did was come off as predictable and a bit antagonist toward conventional morality...maybe that was the point, but again, no comment on the artistic content. It was poorly executed and excruciatingly drawn out. The end was almost a relief...even mildly amusing. Both main characters displayed canned hypocrisy throughout and I would guess that to be another part of the "art" content....once again, no comment. Don't waste your time. Sex is fun and simulated sex isn't...especially when the simulation paints sex to be so.....well, no comment.
Nymphomaniac: Vol. I (2013) 720p YIFY Movie
Nymphomaniac: Vol. I (2013)
A self-diagnosed nymphomaniac recounts her erotic experiences to the man who saved her after a beating.
IMDB: 3.02 Likes
- Genre: Drama |
- Quality: 720p
- Size: 1.79G
- Resolution: 1280x544 / 24.000 FPSfps
- Language: English
- Run Time: 118
- IMDB Rating: 3.0/10
- MPR: Normal
- Peers/Seeds: 1 / 1
The Synopsis for Nymphomaniac: Vol. I (2013) 720p
A man named Seligman finds a fainted wounded woman in an alley and he brings her home. She tells him that her name is Joe and that she is nymphomaniac. Joe tells her life and sexual experiences with hundreds of men since she was a young teenager while Seligman tells about his hobbies, such as fly fishing, reading about Fibonacci numbers or listening to organ music.
The Director and Players for Nymphomaniac: Vol. I (2013) 720p
The Reviews for Nymphomaniac: Vol. I (2013) 720p
Complete waste of time that give porn a bad name.Reviewed byjason boldtVote: 1/10
Well, to be fair, interesting THEN painful.
At first you are taken in with the actors and the provocative scenes. But, just as soon as you're in, you're quickly taken back out by the completely UNNATURAL DIALOGUE between the main character and the host she is telling her stories to. (The dialogue tries to be deep, but it ends up being just plain silly).
On the other hand, it's almost worth watching just for the comical aspect of this, just to see the two actors telling the stories keep a straight face while they're saying such SILLY things - their solemness is the icing on the cake.
As for the "provocative" stuff, it doesn't really have the bite it might have pre-internet.
It just ends up being Art at the expense of entertainment - abstract for the sake of being abstract, and provocative for the sake of being provocative.
So many people wrote how "disturbed" they were by "this shitty sex movie". I divide them into two groups:
1. First group decided to watch the film because they love sex, porn, and the title "Nymphomaniac" sure sounds like their kind of thing. Then they went to cinema (or Internet), watched it, and were disappointed because "they had to listen to a lot of boring dialogues before there was a sex scene" (to which they could masturbate to if they were alone). Then when a sex scene would finally come, it wasn't as exciting as it "should have been". So they were disturbed at how much this movie didn't fulfill their expectations.
And they are right, it didn't. Because it's not a shitty, cheap movie, meant to get them turned on. As unbelievable as it sounds to them, the purpose of both the film and the sex scenes go much deeper. And if only they had bothered to pay a little more attention to the "boring dialogue", perhaps they would have noticed that the meaning of the movie - and the real story - goes on in that conversation. And the sex scenes were not as sexy as they "should have been", according to them, because it's not about turning people on. It's a film for you brain, not your genitals. And that is precisely why people from the group one were disappointed. Good.
2. The second group are the people who were "disturbed" because there were too many explicit sex scenes. I have nothing to say about this except: Are you serious??? Have you looked up the definition of the word "nymphomaniac" before you decided to watch it? And again, they missed the purpose because for some reason unknown to me, they were too focused on the "filthy" sex scenes in the film named ~Nymphomaniac~ that they missed to actually watch it.
The point is: If you focus on the ~sex~, you won't like this movie, nor get it. Therefore, if you want a cheap turn on, just go watch porn, and let artists like Lars take sex to a different level, a little above the primitive urge.
Because the reason Joe was "a horny bitch" is a little different than yours.