Rings (2017) 720p YIFY Movie

Rings (2017)

A young woman finds herself on the receiving end of a terrifying curse that threatens to take her life in seven days.

IMDB: 4.517 Likes

  • Genre: Drama | Horror
  • Quality: 720p
  • Size: 1.24G
  • Resolution: 1280x720 / 23.976 (23976/1000) fpsfps
  • Language: English
  • Run Time: 102
  • IMDB Rating: 4.5/10 
  • MPR: Normal
  • Peers/Seeds: 2 / 11

The Synopsis for Rings (2017) 720p

Julia becomes worried about her boyfriend, Holt, when he explores the dark urban legend of a mysterious video said to kill the watcher seven days after viewing. She sacrifices herself to save her boyfriend and in doing so makes a horrifying discovery: there is a "movie within the movie" that no one has ever seen before.

The Director and Players for Rings (2017) 720p

[Director]F. Javier Gutiérrez
[Role:]Johnny Galecki
[Role:]Alex Roe
[Role:]Matilda Anna Ingrid Lutz

The Reviews for Rings (2017) 720p

Reviewed byview_and_reviewVote: 2/10/10

Sequels are watched based upon the strength of their predecessors. Itis known that most sequels aren't as good but sometimes the firstinstallment was so good that the sequel can never live up to it and nordoes it have to to be appreciated. The Ring was the scariest movie I'dseen in 20 years. I remember being genuinely spooked when watching thatmovie. Part two wasn't as good but it was watchable. Rings, on theother hand, was trash.

We all know the premise by now: watch the video, get a phone call andthen you have seven days to live. We all know who Samara is and we allknow what she does to her victims, so that avenue is cutoff as far asgenerating scares. Where do you go from there then if you want to tryto cash in on the Samara craze one more time?

In Rings a professor discovers the Samara video and watches it. He alsofinds out that in order to stop the impending death all he has to do isrecord it and have someone else watch it. He then decides to turn thisinto an experiment in order to answer some elusive metaphysicalquestions. He ensures that all of his subjects are able to shake theSamara curse by recording the video and having another person watch it.Of course this would be a never ending chain of video watching butwhatever. In steps the main characters, two lovebirds that are primescary movie age (18-25).

The writers completely mailed this one in. There was no real thoughtgiven to how they would revive the Samara story. There was nolegitimate path for the main character, Julia (Matilda Lutz), to beinserted into this movie yet the writers clumsily shoe horned her inthere; which meant I had to be assaulted by her poor acting the entiremovie. In fact, I'd say that was the scariest thing: her acting.

With no fresh and innovative means to scare its audience the directorrelied on cheap jump scares: suddenly opening umbrella, barking dog,truck horn, breaking glass, etc. Not one of these lousy attempts atspooking the viewer even managed to register a single uptick in heartrate. This movie was lame from the word "go".

They did attempt to legitimize the movie by casting actors such as TheBig Bang Theory's Johnny Galecki and veteran actor Vincent D'Onofriobut their talents were wasted. This movie was an abysmal failure andeven though Samara may not be dead and gone this franchise certainlyis.

Reviewed byBrandon ZarzycznyVote: 6/10/10

The movie was better than it had any right to be, but it didn't try todo anything new. I actually enjoyed the mystery aspect of the film, butit kind of failed as a scary movie, as it wasn't scary at all and wasfilled with cheap fake jump scares. The acting from the two main peopleisn't bad, but you can tell they got the parts just because they werepretty. This movie seems much more of a sequel to the original movieThe Ring, forgetting most of the nonsense from The Ring 2. Rings alsoseems to take more inspiration from the original Japanese films, wherea lot more is learned about Samara's birth parents.

From the trailers, I thought that this movie might have a lot morestuff with social media, but other than a few things, this movie couldhave taken place a decade ago. The only thing to show that the film'sin the present is that they copy & paste video files, and they usesmart phones as flashlights. Overall, the film isn't horrible, but italso isn't very good, I definitely wouldn't recommend it.

If you want to see my full review in video form you can check it outhere: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JstAEbfzXwI

Reviewed bybkrauser-81-311064Vote: 3/10/10

Twelve years have passed since we last caught a glimpse of thewaterlogged Samara clambering out of the well; twelve years. I want youto remember that because evidently the makers of Rings, the newestinstallment in the series forgot. They forgot that the origin of theirvengeful specter has already been told and the supposed rules ofSamara's curse need maybe a refresher at most. Yet given the fact thisfilm simultaneously ups stakes and downplays expectations I have toask, what are we supposed to be looking at: a reboot? A sequel? A spinoff? I can't honestly tell you what we're supposed to be watching, butwhat it looks like is a really s***ty horror movie – one that plumforgot to bring the scary. Jump scares abound in this movie and ifthat's all it takes to jolt you out of your seat then watch out for theloud claps of car doors closing and umbrellas bursting open. Otherwisethe second scariest thing about this movie is it makes an entire ruralGeorgia town look like the McPoyles from It's Always Sunny(2005-Present).

After an absurd opening hook provided by the single worst in-flightmovie ever, the film begins with a young teenage couple inexplicablyagog about the legend of Orpheus. Male Meatbag #1 (Roe) is headed offto college leaving Female Meatbag #1 (Ingrid Lutz) to wait for theinevitable turkey drop back in their hometown. The film insinuatesshe's taking care of a sick family member but we never see them and theplot thread drops as soon as Male Meatbag #1 stops answering his phone.Female Meatbag #1 becomes upset and makes her way to the guy's collegewhere we meet (or rather re-meet) Male Meatbag #2 (Galecki). #2 is abiology professor who in addition to barely teaching classes alsosomehow managed to start an experimental death cult to protect himselffrom the cursed tape he recently found. Male Meatbag #1 is involved;Female Meatbag #1 sees the video, Female Meatbag #2 (Teegarden) diesand we all go on a glorious adventure to stop our flat screens fromattacking.

The main problem that every film in the Ring Series (2002-Present) hasto try to overcome is finding a second act that matters. The conceptall but requires the main source of fright and threat to bookend anarrative dead zone whereby victims anxiously await their fates. TheRing (2002) accomplished this with an engaging mystery. The characterswere given a clear time clock, elevated stakes and clues within thecursed video to give the audience something to play with.

Rings attempts the same thing, but since the audience should have somecontext (again it's been twelve years), we're all just twiddling ourthumbs waiting for the characters to catch up. The mystery is aslightly different take on the curse (it's also a slightly differentvideo), but it hardly justifies this airless, soulless cash grab.Especially since the Gothic atmosphere of the first is completelyabsent and all we're left with to mull on is a late appearance byVincent D'Onofrio.

For what it's worth, supporting players Vincent D'Onofrio and JohnnyGalecki outshine the leads in this insipid film like rusted tin cans ina rubbish tip. They're not by any means good, but they wisely play totheir strengths unlike Ingrid Lutz who looks like she's about to bursta blood vessel trying to fake an American accent. Of course incomparison to Roe, she actually looks like she's trying to sell herrole. Roe ambles onto the screen like a last place relay racer whosuddenly decided "I just don't give a f*** anymore." This film is aredundant farce lacking any of the inspiration that made the firstAmerican remake not just good but a J-horror trendsetter. The chillsand thrills are non-existent and story can't help but flounder in a seaof inattention and indecision. What is Rings supposed to be? I honestlythink it might just be a bad joke twelve years in the making.

Rings (2017) 720p Related Movies

Wonderstruck (2017) Poster

Wonderstruck (2017)

Stay Hungry (1976) 1080p Poster

Stay Hungry (1976) 1080p

Welcome the Stranger (2018) Poster

Welcome the Stranger (2018)

Veronica (2017) Poster

Veronica (2017)

Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle (2017) Poster

Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle (2017)

Stay Hungry (1976) Poster

Stay Hungry (1976)

No Surrender (2011) 1080p Poster

No Surrender (2011) 1080p

Flying Lessons (2010) 1080p Poster

Flying Lessons (2010) 1080p