What's With Wheat? (2016) 1080p YIFY Movie

What's With Wheat? (2016) 1080p

What's with Wheat? is a movie starring Cyndi O'Meara, David Perlmutter, and Sayer Ji. A hard hitting investigation helping to answer the burning questions about our health today. This documentary features 15 global experts who shed...

IMDB: 6.50 Likes

  • Genre: Documentary |
  • Quality: 1080p
  • Size: 1.50G
  • Resolution: / fps
  • Language: English
  • Run Time: 79
  • IMDB Rating: 6.5/10 
  • MPR: Normal
  • Peers/Seeds: 21 / 27

The Synopsis for What's With Wheat? (2016) 1080p

Our wheat has changed dramatically, it doesn't even resemble what it used to look like. Not only are we seeing more wheat and gluten sensitivity, there is also a strong connection between gluten and autoimmune diseases. Tens of thousands of people are suffering with ill health and don't realise it's a result of the food choices they are making. Some assume it is part of their genetic make-up or the body changing as they get older. People need to become educated, knowledgeable and aware. They need to start making changes to improve the health of their children and future generations.


The Director and Players for What's With Wheat? (2016) 1080p

[Director]Justin Brown
[Role:]Terry Wahls
[Role:]Sayer Ji
[Role:]David Perlmutter
[Role:]Cyndi O'Meara


The Reviews for What's With Wheat? (2016) 1080p


It gets one thinking. So THINK.Reviewed byGrangerVote: 5/10

The best thing this "documentary" does is get people thinking about their nutrition. Is wheat the "bad guy"? That's not really established. What we have are a number of PHDs and people recognized in their field giving what is commonly referred to as "expert opinions", with a little bit of science thrown in and (possibly) some good points made. Is it pure propaganda as some claim? No. Does it contain some opinionated and skewed statements? Yes. (The one about bad bad glucose coming from wheat was almost a showstopper for me).

Glucose is pure brain food. Pretty much every cell in the body uses glucose as raw fuel. Now sucrose and high fructose-- sure, badmouth those all you want. They're the equivalent of taking the beneficial amounts of arsenic found in potatoes and concentrating that in a can of soda. But speaking of glucose from wheat as a bad thing clearly points to the speaker as being biased in presentation.

But the purpose is to get people to think... so let's THINK. Look at our diet. What the video presents is very accurate. We tend to push veggies, fruits, nuts, beans and rice to the side and go for the wheat-based quick-serve foods. Yes, the wheat crops are treated with chemicals rather than natural means-- the whole purpose of which is to monetarily enrich the corporate shareholder structure... not feed people nutritional food.

Some might argue that bread itself is "unnatural". I mean... look what it takes to produce the stuff! But that's opinion, not established fact. However, the fact that we eat SO MUCH bread in our diets (as accurately portrayed in the discussion) can't be good for us.

It is widely-recognized that the best "diet" is simply eat well-rounded meals containing a variety of food types. Watching people on the video gulp down oil-and-cheese-laden pizza, followed up with a sugar-topped cake nearly made my stomach churn. Great propaganda there... but it makes the point. Exactly what are we feeding our bodies? Garbage in-- garbage out.

I appreciated the personal experiences of those who went wheat-free and found their health improved amazingly-- especially the woman who was wheelchair bound. Yet, those are individual experiences not backed up by hard data. It's a personal, subjective experience.

If we follow the instructions of every one of these videos produced we will never eat wheat, red meat, bacon, milk, cheese, eggs, grain of any kind, any kind of fats, coffee, chocolate, etc etc etc. Enjoy your starvation!

Moderation in all things. I am sure this video is very one-sided in its presentation. However it did get me thinking and you know what... the symptoms described were right down the line with my physical condition. So I'm going to THINK and try the simple test they presented: one month with no wheat at all. I'll eat potatoes, veggies, fruit, chicken, fish, nuts, beans, rice, and other types of food. I will avoid wheat like it's toxic. And I will see for myself whether (in my case) wheat is as detrimental as they say. I'll know at the end of 30 short days. What would be stupid would be to suspect wheat may be a major dietary issue and not at least TRY and see if that's the case.

So I give it 5 stars for getting me to think about the issue. At the worst all I can lose is 30 days without chocolate chip cookies. If the video is bogus, I'll know at the end of 30 days. If it's on-the-button (at least i my case) I'll know that too.

The only question I have is this: if (according to this video) one microgram of wheat is enough to trigger a serious reaction in some people... how can a person be absolutely assured they are actually eliminating all wheat in their diet. This documentary did a lot of complaining and warning but offered very little information in actually helping people understand how to totally "zero wheat". Does my vitamin pill contain a microgram of wheat? What about the filler for other medicines I take (on which my very life depends).

This film draws a big question mark but provides little in the way of answers. For asking the question I give it my "mediocre" score of "worth watching but not exceptional". They simply focus too much on "how bad wheat is" and not nearly enough on personal solutions. However there's the Net and "Wheat-free diet" searches. We can fill in the blanks. I'll let you know in 30 days about the personal solutions.

30 DAYS LATERSo I went off wheat for 30 days. The result: no difference. Yes, my diet did improve. When one stops eating cookies and crackers and cereal and other wheat/sugar-primary items, it is interesting how many more foods become of primary interest. Celery or banana with peanut butter, zucchini with a little spice, rice and bean combinations, fruit instead of candy, etc etc. This can't help but improve both diet and health.

But overall result? No discernible difference other than what would be expected from an improved diet devoid of combined sugars and fats. My digestive tract didn't improve, my energy didn't improve, I didn't experience a miraculous change in overall health and welfare.

In short, while the film makes some good points, it all boils down to a simple fact: eat well-rounded meals, cut down on meat and make it a 3-ounce side dish instead of an 8-ounce main course, eliminate completely refined sugars and those sugar/fat-heavy deserts, and you'll be fine.

Of course, if you have an allergy to wheat, going off wheat 30 days is going to be an eye-opener. But other than that, for the everyday person, this film does nothing more than point out "The American Diet is a killer"... which everyone should already know. If not, that's the story to take home. But is wheat "bad food"? Perhaps if it's laced with pesticide, but otherwise no. Total nonsense. This film is typical propaganda and like all such films, needs researched beyond surface appearance.

30 days without wheat made no difference in my case... except to open my eyes to a better overall dietary method-- which I still retain.

Reviewed byxhidden99Vote: 1/10/10

All progress is evil bad and wrong. Everything you know is wrong.Better we starve to death 7/8ths of the world so that rich white womenin Australia have fewer things to blame their weigh gain on. And whilewe're at it we need also ban all meat, all grains and all starches. Anddon't be too quick to pick fruit off the trees either because that'sunnatural too and controlled by Big Fruit! The first thing we need todo is outlaw all food consumption unless it literally grows wild awayfrom any external influence, ever. If that means everyone starves andwe all die at age 27, so be it.

Reviewed bynash11780Vote: 2/10/10

Up to 6% of people suffer from gluten intolerance and celiac disease,and we are seeing a slow and steady rise in this condition. Yet, thisdocumentary fails to detail the root theorectical cause of thiscondition - leaky gut syndrome - which is due to overuse ofantibiotics, non-steriodal anti-inflammatory drugs, and high fat diets.

Instead they blame gluten sensitivity on GMOs, pesticides, and the riseof Frankecrops, large wheat hybrids that do no resemble the ancientgrains from which they came. No scientific studies are cited to backtheir claim that modern gluten is responsible for everything fromheadaches, auto- immune diseases, and even autism! This is a veryunscientific documentary and if you dig a little deeper, somerecognizable pro- Paleo bloggers funded by the Weston Price Foundationand other Agribusiness groups are clearly behind this propaganda. Don'twaste your time watching this film.

What's With Wheat? (2016) 1080p Related Movies

The Big Secret (2016) 1080p Poster

The Big Secret (2016) 1080p

Bohemian Rhapsody (2018) 1080p Poster

Bohemian Rhapsody (2018) 1080p

Mostly Sunny (2017) 1080p Poster

Mostly Sunny (2017) 1080p

Inner Worlds, Outer Worlds (2012) 1080p Poster

Inner Worlds, Outer Worlds (2012) 1080p

Forgotten Plague (2016) 1080p Poster

Forgotten Plague (2016) 1080p

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald (2018) 1080p Poster

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald (2018) 1080p

Triple Frontier (2019) 1080p Poster

Triple Frontier (2019) 1080p

Mortal Engines (2018) 1080p Poster

Mortal Engines (2018) 1080p